Mannschaften
Bezirksliga
Rg | Mannschaft | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | MP | BP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
(2048)
|
X | 4.5 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 14 | 44.0 |
2 |
(2047)
|
3.5 | X | 2.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 14 | 44.0 |
3 |
(2037)
|
4.5 | 5.5 | X | 3.0 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 10 | 39.5 |
4 |
(2081)
|
2.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | X | 4.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 9 | 36.0 |
5 |
(2038)
|
3.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | X | 5.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 9 | 35.5 |
6 |
(2008)
|
2.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | X | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 9 | 32.5 |
7 |
(1995)
|
2.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 5.5 | X | 5.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 7 | 32.5 |
8 |
(2012)
|
1.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 | X | 4.0 | 4.5 | 7 | 31.5 |
9 |
(1926)
|
3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | X | 4.0 | 6 | 32.5 |
10 |
(1939)
|
5.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | X | 5 | 32.0 |
Leider kam unser Neuzugang wenige Tage zu spät und durfte nur noch als Ersatzspieler nachgemeldet werden. Mit etwas mehr Glück hätte der Abstieg aber durchaus vermieden werden können (dazu war Platz 8 nötig). Die Rundengegner waren Sendling (Runde 1), Haar (2), Allianz (3), Dachau (4), Bayern (5), Tarrasch (6), MSC (7), Garching (8) und Südost; weiteres hier.
Nr | Name | DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Pkt. | Spl. | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Thiel,Fabian | 2089 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 3.5 | 9 | 38.9 |
2 | Rupp,Eckart | 1930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | ||
3 | Weingut,Roland | 1941 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 50 | |||
4 | Koppen,Harald | 1967 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 22.2 |
5 | Brunner,Helmut | 1913 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 3.5 | 8 | 43.8 | |
6 | Rispler,Matthias | 1898 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | ||
7 | Rösch,Julian | 1835 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 5 | 9 | 55.6 |
8 | Blind,Thomas | 1935 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | + | 4.5 | 8 | 56.3 | |
9 | Hinterreiter,Markus | 2074 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | 4 | 87.5 | |||||
10 | Sellmair,Reinhard | 1890 | ½ | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 75 | |||||||
11 | Westphal,Dieter | |||||||||||||
12 | Hagenguth,Holger | 1789 | ||||||||||||
13 | Zeller,Patrick | 1767 | ||||||||||||
14 | Paul,Franz Xaver | 1756 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 3 | 50 | ||||||
15 | Gambietz,Winfried | 1692 | ||||||||||||
16 | Schelle,Michael | 1710 | ||||||||||||
17 | Kanduth,Friedrich | 1616 | ||||||||||||
18 | Egger,Thomas | 1549 | ||||||||||||
19 | Selinger,Silviu | 1541 | ||||||||||||
20 | Ehrler,Günter | 1603 | ||||||||||||
Gesamt | 3 | 4 | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 32 | 72 | 44.4 |
B-Klasse 2
Rg | Mannschaft | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | MP | BP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
(1744)
|
X | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 15 | 44.5 |
2 |
(1792)
|
4.0 | X | 4.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 14 | 42.0 |
3 |
(1773)
|
3.5 | 3.5 | X | 3.5 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 12 | 43.0 |
4 |
(1702)
|
4.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | X | 6.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 12 | 40.0 |
5 |
(1751)
|
3.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | X | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 9 | 34.0 |
6 |
(1701)
|
3.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | X | 6.5 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 7 | 34.5 |
7 |
(1680)
|
4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | X | 5.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6 | 32.5 |
8 |
(1724)
|
2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | X | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6 | 32.5 |
9 |
(1722)
|
1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 | X | 3.0 | 4 | 26.5 |
10 |
(1797)
|
2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | X | 3 | 29.5 |
Dank zweier Neuzugänge verfügte die Zweite über eine starke Ersatzbank und konnte das beste Ergebnis der Vereinsgeschichte erreichen. Die Rundengegner waren Markt Schwaben (Runde 1), Bayern (2), Zugzwang (3), Roter Turm (4), Allianz (5), Lohhof (6), Tarrasch (7), Aschheim (8) und Kirchseeon (9); weiteres hier.
Nr | Name | DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Pkt. | Spl. | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sellmair,Reinhard | 1890 | - | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||||||
2 | Hagenguth,Holger | 1789 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | + | ½ | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 33.3 |
3 | Paul,Franz Xaver | 1756 | 1 | ½ | - | ½ | 1 | 3 | 5 | 60 | ||||
4 | Gambietz,Winfried | 1692 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 7 | 8 | 87.5 | |
5 | Schelle,Michael | 1710 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 |
6 | Kanduth,Friedrich | 1616 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 |
7 | Egger,Thomas | 1549 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | ||
8 | Ehrler,Günter | 1603 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 5 | 7 | 71.4 | ||
9 | Westphal,Dieter | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 100 | |||||||
10 | Strohmeier,Rüdiger | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | 4 | 37.5 | ||||||
11 | Mittermaier,Martin | 1546 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||||||
12 | Selinger,Silviu | 1541 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||||||
13 | Hobrecker,Michel | 1525 | ||||||||||||
14 | Radalj,Zoran | 1363 | ½ | 0 | 0.5 | 2 | 25 | |||||||
15 | Ellmann,Eduard | 1444 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 3 | 16.7 | ||||||
16 | Frangu,Berat | 1429 | ||||||||||||
17 | Kaifler,Erich | 1413 | ||||||||||||
18 | Riedle,Maximilian | 1382 | ||||||||||||
19 | Weissteiner,Walter | 1362 | ||||||||||||
20 | Blank,Nicolas | 1308 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||||||
Gesamt | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 34.5 | 72 | 47.9 |
C-Klasse 1
Aufgrund schwacher Aufstellungen gegen die Mitkonkurrenten im Abstiegskampf war die Dritte letztlich chancenlos. Die Rundengegner waren Solln (Runde 1), Bayern (2), Forstenried (3), Höhenkirchen (4), Neuperlach (5), Meiller (6), Poing (7), spielfrei (8) und Ismaning (9); weiteres hier.
Nr | Name | DWZ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Pkt. | Spl. | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mittermaier,Martin | 1546 | - | 1 | ||||||||||
2 | Hobrecker,Michel | 1525 | - | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | ||||
3 | Ellmann,Eduard | 1444 | ½ | 0 | 0 | - | 0.5 | 4 | 12.5 | |||||
4 | Frangu,Berat | 1429 | - | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 14.3 | ||
5 | Radalj,Zoran | 1363 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 1.5 | 3 | 50 | ||||||
6 | Blank,Nicolas | 1308 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 2.5 | 5 | 50 | ||||
7 | Selinger,Silviu | 1541 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | 3 | 16.7 | ||||||
8 | Kaifler,Erich | 1413 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | ||||||
9 | Riedle,Maximilian | 1382 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 8 | 18.8 | |
10 | Weissteiner,Walter | 1362 | 0 | ½ | 1 | - | 1.5 | 4 | 37.5 | |||||
11 | Wolf,Dietrich Hans | 1362 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | - | 1 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | ||
12 | Mueller,Johann | 1383 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||||||
13 | Rosa,Andreas | 1060 | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | 2 | 4 | 50 | |||||
14 | Weitz,Andreas | 1103 | ||||||||||||
15 | Fehlhammer,Heinz | 1139 | ||||||||||||
16 | Sengle,Arthur | 1034 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||||
17 | Lang,Andreas | 982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100 | |||||||
18 | Radalj,Raffael | 1057 | ||||||||||||
19 | Feser,Titus | 959 | ||||||||||||
20 | Kordes,Sebastian | 854 | ||||||||||||
Gesamt | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 16.5 | 63 | 26.2 |